Building a good guitar pedalboard on a budget is easy if the budget only needs to cover the pedals.
Things get more interesting when that same budget also has to pay for the actual pedalboard, power supply and patch cables.
That was the idea behind our €500 pedalboard challenge.
My friend Mikko joined me in the studio, and we each had roughly €500 to build a complete pedalboard that we would genuinely use ourselves. Rather than trying to find the theoretically “best” pedals for the money, we approached the challenge according to the music we actually play.
That ended up producing two surprisingly different boards.
Mikko built a compact and very versatile setup aimed mainly at pop, rock and worship music. I went in a slightly different direction, concentrating more on gain staging, dynamics and having a few pedals that could cover a lot of ground.
And, as usually happens when you give guitarists a budget, we immediately discovered that €500 disappears rather quickly.
The Rules of the €500 Pedalboard Challenge
The basic idea was simple.
We had around €500 each and needed to build a complete usable guitar pedalboard.
That meant the budget had to include more than effects. We also needed the board itself, power and the patch cables connecting everything together.
Both of us started with a RockBoard Duo 2.1. For power, we used a One Spot rather than spending a large part of the budget on an isolated power supply.
Normally I would probably prefer a more elaborate power solution, especially for a larger permanent board. For this particular challenge, however, the One Spot worked surprisingly well. We didn’t get any annoying hum or other obvious noise problems from it.
Sometimes the inexpensive solution really does just work.
We also used RockBoard patch cables. They were inexpensive enough that they didn’t destroy the budget, although I generally prefer the similarly shaped EBS patch cables because of the way their connectors sit next to power cables.
Already you can see the problem with a challenge like this.
Before buying a single compressor, overdrive, delay or reverb, part of the €500 is already gone.
That makes every pedal choice matter quite a bit more.
Mikko’s Budget Guitar Pedalboard
Mikko’s main goal was versatility.
He plays a lot of worship music at church, but also plays pop, rock and the occasional wedding gig. His main amp is a Vox AC15, which also affected the overdrive choices.
Vox amps can be slightly picky about drive pedals. A pedal that sounds fantastic into a cleaner Fender-style amp doesn’t necessarily react the same way with the strong midrange and character of a Vox.
For the demo, we ran his AC15 through a Two Notes Torpedo Live using an OwnHammer Vox-style cabinet IR. That allowed us to push the amp harder without becoming extremely unpopular with everyone else in the house.
Mikko ended up fitting seven effects onto his board.
That is a lot of sounds for the money.
Mooer Yellow Comp
The first pedal was the Mooer Yellow Comp.
This is an optical compressor, and Mikko used it almost as an always-on tone sweetener rather than trying to create an obviously crushed compressor sound.
That is probably the way I like this pedal best too.
I actually owned a Yellow Comp for quite a long time in the past, and using one again reminded me why I liked it. It does one relatively simple compressor thing, but it does it very well.
The effect evens out the notes and adds a little sweetness without immediately making the guitar feel completely flattened.
For clean playing, rhythmic parts and the kind of articulate guitar sounds Mikko uses in worship music, it makes a lot of sense.
Mooer Black Secret
Next came the Mooer Black Secret.
The basic idea here is familiar: it gets you into RAT-style distortion territory and gives you Vintage and Turbo modes.
Mikko preferred the Vintage setting.
More importantly, the Black Secret worked really well with the Vox.
That mid-focused RAT-style drive combined with the naturally strong personality of the Vox produces exactly the kind of crunchy rock sound you would expect it to.
It is not subtle.
That is part of the point.
Between the Yellow Comp and Black Secret, the board was already capable of moving from polished clean sounds into fairly aggressive rock tones.
Mooer Blues Crab
For lower-gain sounds, Mikko chose the Mooer Blues Crab.
This sits much more in the Bluesbreaker-style overdrive world. Compared with the Black Secret, the sound is clearer, less saturated and much more suitable when you want the basic character of the guitar and amp to remain obvious.
I liked this pedal quite a bit.
The amount of gain is relatively restrained, which is actually useful in a board like this. You already have the Black Secret when things need to become aggressive.
The Blues Crab gives you another gain stage rather than simply providing a quieter version of the same distortion sound.
This is one of the recurring themes in both of our pedalboards.
Having multiple gain sounds becomes much more useful when each pedal has a different job.
Two Different Delay Pedals
This is where Mikko’s approach became slightly unusual.
Instead of choosing one expensive delay pedal, he managed to fit two cheaper delays onto the board.
The first was the Mooer Ana Echo.
It is a straightforward analog-style delay that works really nicely for general rhythm and lead sounds. There is nothing particularly complicated about it.
Sometimes that is exactly what you need.
Turn it on, dial in some repeats and play.
The second delay was the NUX Time Core.
This gave Mikko more delay sounds and, importantly, tap tempo. That becomes useful for rhythmic parts and especially the dotted-delay-adjacent world of worship and U2-inspired guitar.
There were compromises.
The tap tempo system was more limited than what you get from more expensive delays, and this is one area where the €500 budget became noticeable. Good compact delays with flexible tap tempo functions can eat a surprisingly large part of a small pedalboard budget.
On the other hand, the Time Core offered a lot of sounds for the money, including modulation, reverse, ping-pong and analog-style delays, plus a looper.
That is quite a lot of functionality from one inexpensive pedal.
Mooer Skyverb
Mikko also wanted a dedicated reverb even though his Vox already had reverb available.
I understand that completely.
Amp reverb is great until you need something dramatically bigger.
The Mooer Skyverb gave him that option.
It covers several reverb styles and can go from relatively normal ambience into the larger, washier sounds that make sense for worship and ambient guitar.
The important thing was that it didn’t feel like a novelty effect.
It was actually useful.
With a tight budget, there is always the temptation to add another inexpensive pedal just because you technically can. But if that pedal only does one bizarre sound you use for thirty seconds every six months, it probably wasn’t a particularly good use of the budget.
The Skyverb earned its place because it expanded what the entire board could do.
Mooer Trelicopter
The last pedal on Mikko’s board was a known favourite: the Mooer Trelicopter.
It is a straightforward tremolo, but there is a useful little trick here.
The pedal gives you a slight volume boost when engaged.
Tremolo can sometimes create the impression that your overall volume has dropped because the effect is literally turning the signal up and down. The Trelicopter compensates for that slightly.
If your amp is already sitting near the edge of breakup, that extra level can also push it a little harder.
Even better, if you turn the tremolo depth down, you can use the pedal almost like a clean boost.
Mikko placed it at the end of the chain, which makes that especially useful.
For one song it can be a tremolo.
For another it can simply give the entire board a little more level.
That is exactly the kind of double duty I like to see on a budget pedalboard.
Did Mikko Stay Under €500?
More or less.
Our maths became increasingly questionable as the video continued.
According to one version of our calculations, Mikko was around €10 over budget. Then we realised one of the prices we had written down might have been wrong.
So perhaps the most accurate answer is that he built a pedalboard in the general neighbourhood of €500.
Close enough.
What mattered more was the result.
Seven pedals gave him compression, multiple gain stages, two different approaches to delay, reverb and tremolo. Several of those pedals also had multiple modes.
For pop, rock, worship and general gigging, it was an impressively versatile little board.
My €500 Budget Guitar Pedalboard
My approach was quite different.
Rather than seeing how many pedals I could fit onto the board, I wanted to build something close to how I actually construct guitar tones.
That means gain stages.
I like having a relatively clean base sound and then using pedals to push the amplifier in different ways. I also like being able to control the amount of gain with my picking dynamics and the guitar volume rather than having completely separate preset sounds for everything.
For my demo, I used my Telecaster into the Uraltone Jr., then into the Two Notes Torpedo Live with my usual closed-back 4×12 style cabinet sound.
The board started with a compressor.
BOSS CS-3 Compressor
I went with the BOSS CS-3.
There is nothing particularly exotic about that choice.
It is a classic BOSS pedal, it is buffered, it is built like the usual small BOSS tank and it can cover a surprisingly wide range of compression sounds.
I wanted it for two things.
The first was relatively normal compression. I could even out picked notes and add a small level boost into the amp.
The second was considerably less subtle.
Turn the sustain up, change the attack and you can get into that heavily squashed funk sound. Think Vulfpeck, Snarky Puppy and that general world where every note feels extremely tight and controlled.
My playing during the demo might not have reached Vulfpeck levels.
The compressor sound got closer.
Having both of those options from one pedal made the CS-3 a good starting point.
Caline Pure Sky: The Cheapest Pedal on My Board
Then we get to an old favourite.
The Caline Pure Sky was easily one of the cheapest pedals in the entire challenge.
I’ve used this pedal in a lot of videos over the years, and there is a reason for that.
It is simply a very good inexpensive overdrive.
The Pure Sky is generally associated with the Timmy-style overdrive idea. What I particularly like about it is the way it can push a clean or high-headroom amplifier without completely replacing the amp’s character.
For this board, I used quite a lot of output level.
The Uraltone has plenty of clean headroom, so pushing the front end harder gives me more control through my picking.
Play lightly and things clean up.
Dig in and the amp starts cooking.
Add more gain on the pedal and you can move surprisingly far into rock territory.
I recently used essentially the same idea at a wedding gig. The Pure Sky stayed on and I changed the character of the sound using my hands and guitar controls rather than constantly stepping on different pedals.
That is exactly the kind of pedal I want on a small board.
Mooer Cruncher: Better as a Lead Pedal?
The next gain stage was the Mooer Cruncher.
This one took me a little longer to understand.
On its own, I didn’t immediately love it for my main rhythm tone.
The sound felt slightly too closed and congested compared with what I wanted.
Then I combined it with the Pure Sky.
Suddenly it made much more sense.
The Pure Sky helped control the low end and changed the way the Cruncher hit the amp. Together, they gave me a heavier sound that was much tighter and more useful than the Cruncher by itself.
That also turned the Cruncher into something closer to a lead or additional gain-stage pedal for me.
This is why judging drive pedals completely in isolation can sometimes be misleading.
A pedal doesn’t exist alone once it is on a real board.
It interacts with the guitar, the amplifier and everything placed before it.
The Cruncher wasn’t my favourite standalone pedal in the challenge.
As part of the signal chain, however, it earned its place.
With the Pure Sky, Cruncher and compressor available, I could move through several levels of gain and even get into fairly ridiculous prog-style saturated lead sounds when everything was engaged.
More is more, apparently.
BOSS TR-2 Tremolo
Next came a pedal I had wanted for quite a while: the BOSS TR-2.
Again, this is not an exciting obscure choice.
It is just a really good tremolo.
And there is something to be said for that.
The TR-2 can move from a subtle pulse behind clean guitar parts into much more obvious helicopter-style effects. More importantly, the normal basic tremolo sound is good.
That matters more to me than having fourteen different waveform modes I will never remember how to access.
For a board designed around actual gigs rather than showing off specifications, the TR-2 makes sense.
NUX Atlantic: The Smartest Space-Saving Choice
The final pedal was the NUX Atlantic.
This might be the most important difference between my board and Mikko’s.
He used separate pedals for delay and reverb.
I used one pedal for both.
The Atlantic has independent delay and reverb sections in the same enclosure, and that saves both money and pedalboard space.
More importantly, I genuinely like the sounds.
The delay side gives you several different flavours, and the tap tempo system is very practical. I have used the Atlantic before, and I still like the way NUX implemented tap tempo without making normal switching awkward.
The reverb side covers the usual useful territory, including larger ambient sounds.
Then there are the routing options.
You can run delay into reverb, reverb into delay or put the two effects in parallel.
That dramatically changes the result.
Add the hold function and you can get into large ambient textures without adding another dedicated pedal.
By the time we reached the end of the demo, I was actually surprised by how many situations this board could cover.
Clean sounds, funk, pop, rock, worship, heavier gain, ambient guitar and fairly aggressive lead tones were all available.
That is what I wanted from the challenge.
Not the largest possible number of pedals.
A small collection of pedals that actually works together.
What Would I Change If I Built the Boards Again?
The biggest lesson came from comparing the two approaches.
Mikko used separate budget delay and reverb pedals, while I used the NUX Atlantic.
If I were rebuilding a similar board, I would lean toward the Atlantic approach.
At the prices we were working with in the original challenge, the Atlantic was in roughly the same territory as buying a separate NUX delay and Mooer reverb together.
It sounded better to me, offered more functionality and took up less room.
And yes, it also looked better.
Clearly the most important technical specification.
The other lesson is that I wouldn’t automatically chase the largest number of pedals.
Mikko’s seven-pedal setup was extremely versatile, but my smaller board wasn’t necessarily less useful.
The difference was how the sounds were organised.
His board gave him more individual effects to choose from.
Mine relied more on combining gain stages and using multifunction pedals.
Neither approach is automatically better.
The right answer depends on how you actually play.
Can You Build a Good Guitar Pedalboard for €500?
Absolutely.
The bigger question is what you expect the €500 to cover.
If you already own a board, power supply and cables, €500 buys a lot of effects.
If you are starting completely from scratch, those less exciting purchases suddenly become a significant part of the budget.
That was probably the most useful part of this challenge.
A real pedalboard isn’t only a collection of colourful boxes.
It needs power. It needs cables. The pedals need somewhere to live. And once you start adding things like isolated power supplies, premium patch cables and larger boards, the price climbs very quickly.
Still, the actual effects do not need to be expensive.
Some of the cheapest pedals in this challenge were also among my favourites.
The Caline Pure Sky remains an excellent example. The Mooer Yellow Comp does one compressor sound really well. The Blues Crab gives you a useful low-gain option, while pedals like the Black Secret can cover much more aggressive territory.
Spend more where the extra money gives you something you genuinely need.
Delay is a good example.
If precise tap tempo, subdivisions and multiple delay types matter to you, allocating a bigger part of the budget to one good delay might make more sense than buying several cheaper pedals.
The same applies to pedals that can do two jobs at once.
On a small board, something like the NUX Atlantic can make considerably more sense than separate delay and reverb pedals.
€500 Pedalboard Challenge: Final Thoughts
The most interesting thing about this challenge was not deciding which one of us built the “better” pedalboard.
It was seeing how different two useful boards could become even with the same basic budget.
Mikko ended up with seven pedals and a huge amount of flexibility. His board makes a lot of sense for worship, pop and rock gigs where he might need several different textures during the same set.
My board had fewer individual pedals, but it was built more around the way I already use an amplifier.
The Pure Sky became the foundation of the gain sound. The Cruncher added another level when needed. The CS-3 could either gently control dynamics or completely squash the guitar. The TR-2 covered tremolo, while the Atlantic handled pretty much all of the delay and reverb duties.
I could genuinely gig with that board.
That is probably the best result a budget pedalboard challenge can have.
You don’t need every pedal.
You need the right pedals for what you actually play.
And if the maths ends up €10 over budget somewhere along the way, I think we can probably forgive you.
Huge thanks to Tampereen Musiikki for providing the gear we used for the original challenge and making this particular piece of pedalboard nonsense possible.
You can check out the gear mentioned in this post through the affiliate links below. Using them does not cost you anything extra, but it helps support isthisgeargood.com and keeps the lights on around here.